Return to previous page

The Darwin Economy

Liberty, Competition, and the Common Good
Summary:

The book argues that Charles Darwin's understanding of competition describes economic reality more accurately than Adam Smith's, suggesting that individual interests often conflict with the common good. It proposes that public policies should be designed to align individual incentives with collective interests, advocating for measures like progressive consumption taxes to address the inefficiencies of unfettered markets.

Key points:

1. Darwin vs. Smith: Robert H. Frank believes Darwin's view of competition fits the economy better than Adam Smith's. He argues that self-interest doesn't always lead to the common good, challenging the idea that markets are perfectly efficient.

Books similar to "The Darwin Economy":